Read pedestrian and crossing factors carefully

Factors and questions on this page
Read the crossing in contextThe crossing, signals and person’s movement belong in the same picture.

Place

Locate the crosswalk, sidewalk and roadway.

Signal

Record what the traffic or pedestrian signal displayed.

Movement

Compare where the person and vehicle were when the crossing began.

Identify the crossing, traffic control and person involved. A marked crosswalk, an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection and a crossing elsewhere can raise different questions. The current manual restricts use of codes 36 and 59 for pedalcyclist unit entries; that database rule does not itself settle a cyclist’s legal rights. Keep the traffic-law inquiry and reporting rule separate.

Questions this group helps answer:

  • When must a driver stop and yield to a pedestrian?
  • What if the person was outside a marked crosswalk?
  • What changes with a crossing signal?
  • Does a pedestrian factor eliminate the driver’s duty of care?
  • Why should a cyclist not automatically be treated as a pedestrian for these codes?

36. Failed to yield right of way to pedestrian

Meaning in the report: A vehicle failed to yield to a pedestrian lawfully using the highway.

What needs explaining: Determine the crossing, signal, sidewalk or other setting and the applicable pedestrian duty. The manual disallows this factor for a unit described as a pedalcyclist. Where was the pedestrian, what indication controlled, and when could the driver perceive the person?

Limits and qualifications: Current law can require stopping and yielding, not just yielding. Check the present statutory wording and incident-date law.

Related law and scope: Duties depend on signals, crosswalk location, pedestrian position and driveway/sidewalk circumstances. Current provisions repeatedly require stop and yield, not merely yield. Section 552.003(b) prohibits a sudden curb departure making stopping/yielding impossible; §552.008 preserves driver due care notwithstanding other chapter provisions.

Sources: TxDOT definition, page 139; Transportation §544.007; Transportation §552.001; Transportation §552.002; Transportation §552.003(a),(c); Transportation §552.006(c); Transportation §552.008; Transportation §552.010; Transportation §552.003(b) (related provision); Transportation §541.001(3),(6) (related provision); Transportation §541.302(2) (related provision); Transportation §552.0035 (related provision); Transportation §552.0036 (related provision); Transportation §545.256 (related provision).

Further care: Legally on the highway is not a full right-of-way test and does not eliminate due care toward other pedestrians. Sudden-entry and signal rules still apply. The 2025 sidewalk-user provisions do not change TxDOT’s factor 36/59 pedalcyclist reporting restrictions. Pedestrian means person on foot; sidewalk user is separately defined.

59. Pedestrian failed to yield right of way to vehicle

Meaning in the report: A pedestrian failed to yield as required and that contributed.

What needs explaining: Apply the particular crossing or signal rule. The manual bars this code for a unit described as a pedalcyclist. Was the pedestrian within a crosswalk, following a signal, between controlled intersections or crossing elsewhere?

Limits and qualifications: A pedestrian duty does not erase the driver’s independent duty of care. Avoid saying a pedestrian is always at fault outside a crosswalk.

Related law and scope: Section 552.003 establishes qualifying crosswalk priority and (b)’s sudden-entry prohibition. Section 552.005(a) assigns pedestrian yielding duties outside a marked or intersection-unmarked crosswalk and where a pedestrian tunnel/overpass exists; (b)–(c) restrict other crossing patterns. Section 552.004 merely says use the right half of a crosswalk if possible.

Sources: TxDOT definition, page 141; Transportation §552.003; Transportation §552.004; Transportation §552.005; Transportation §552.001 (related provision); Transportation §552.002 (related provision); Transportation §552.008 (related provision); Transportation §541.001(3),(6) (related provision); Transportation §541.302(2) (related provision); Transportation §552.0035 (related provision); Transportation §552.0036 (related provision).

Further care: §552.004 is not a general pedestrian-yield statute. Nor does every pedestrian crossing create an obligation to yield to vehicles. Driver due care survives under §552.008. Marked and legally unmarked crosswalks count; signal law and 2025 sidewalk-user rules must be distinguished from pedestrian reporting codes.

Attorney reviewed by Jacob Alford · November 11, 2026

Disclaimer

Jacob Alford, a Texas personal injury lawyer, and Injured Texan PLLC at InjuredTexan.com provide this guide for general information, not legal advice about your particular claim. You are specifically warned about the dangers of attempting to handle a claim yourself.

In Jacobsen v. Allstate, the Court described Allstate’s own internal research that being represented (having a lawyer) meant a claim typically settled for 2–3 times as much. Allstate’s own research also showed that having a lawyer could multiply a recovery perhaps up to 5 times.

The Court documented the internal workings of Allstate’s training for its adjusters and showed just how rigged talking to Big Insurance can be. Read Allstate’s script and judge for yourself: Inside the Insurance Playbook: Jacobsen v. Allstate.

A recorded statement is designed to be used against you, and a verbal settlement can give up valuable rights. Get advice before a voluntary recorded interview or accepting an offer.

You do not need to decide whether to hire a lawyer before asking questions. Jacob Alford and Injured Texan PLLC at InjuredTexan.com offer a free, no-obligation discussion of the process, even if you do not want to hire a lawyer: 210-512-2222. Before you settle, make the free call.