Questions on this page
How can family members document help they provide?
A simple guest book at the house can work well. Jacob Alford’s suggestion at InjuredTexan.com is to let a relative or friend note the date, what help they gave and anything that stood out. You do not need a minute-by-minute accounting of family life. A few honest notes made along the way are more useful than trying to reconstruct everything months later.
Keep a simple dated help log. Identify the person, task, approximate time, and why help was needed. Separate new crash-related assistance from the help that person already provided before the wreck.
Useful entries describe driving to a visit, helping with shoes, lifting a child, cooking, bathing assistance, or covering household chores. Distinguish hands-on help from being available nearby. If the same person helps several family members, do not assign all of that time to the injured person.
Save receipts for paid help and keep unpaid assistance labeled as unpaid. Do not create backdated invoices or assume a relative’s professional salary is the value of every household task. These records can explain the burden on the family and support an evaluation of any recoverable services. Ask your lawyer to identify the applicable category and avoid counting the same loss twice.
Source: Gunn v. McCoy, evidence supporting care needs and future expenses.
Help received
Who helped, what they did, how long it took and any actual cost.
Care recommended
The clinician’s recommendation, its purpose and expected timing.
Costs and changes
Estimates, receipts, work effects and updates as recovery progresses.
What records matter for future treatment or equipment needs?
For a serious injury, a life-care plan can help explain future treatment and its cost. Jacob Alford’s firm, Injured Texan PLLC at InjuredTexan.com, uses physicians as life-care planners. The work starts with the person’s actual medical needs: what care may be needed, how often and for how long. A vocational specialist may address a different question—how the injury changes the work the person can do.
Keep the treating clinician’s recommendations and the reasons for them. Identify the proposed treatment or equipment, expected timing, likely frequency or replacement cycle, anticipated duration, and available cost information.
Distinguish a recommended next step from an option that might be considered if something else fails. Save prescriptions, therapy assessments, equipment evaluations, estimates, and plan coverage decisions. Ask whether the recommendation is temporary, likely ongoing, or not yet known.
A list of possible procedures is not a supported future-care total. The evidence needs to connect a likely need, its relationship to the injury, and a reasonable cost. More complex injuries may require coordinated medical, rehabilitation, or life-care analysis. Keep the facts current when the treatment plan changes rather than multiplying an early estimate over a lifetime.
Source: Gunn v. McCoy, reasonable-probability requirement for future medical expenses.
How are long-term work limits different from past missed wages?
Past missed earnings concern an earlier period. Future earning capacity concerns how the injury is likely to affect the ability to earn going forward. A pay stub can help with both, but it does not answer both.
Keep the restrictions, actual job demands, skills, education, work history, and attempts at modified work or retraining. Explain which duties remain difficult and whether the employer or coworkers are compensating for that difficulty. A vocational assessment may help connect a medical limitation to realistic work options.
Do not assume a temporary restriction will last forever, or that a return at the same salary eliminates every possible future effect. A future claim needs a supported explanation and monetary basis, not just concern that work will be harder. Coordinate this analysis with missed income and work effects so past and future periods are not mixed.
Source: Strauss, earning-capacity proof.
What if the home or vehicle needs adaptation?
Get a functional assessment before treating a major purchase or renovation as a necessary injury expense. Ask the appropriate rehabilitation or treating professional which barrier must be addressed and which adaptation is medically appropriate.
Keep photographs of the existing barrier, the recommendation, alternative designs, written estimates, installation costs, and likely maintenance or replacement needs. Check landlord permission, building requirements, and any health-plan or public-benefit coverage. For vehicle changes, use qualified assessment and installation rather than improvised equipment that could create a safety problem.
Distinguish the cost of an injury-related modification from an unrelated upgrade. If a less costly temporary arrangement works during recovery, record that too. Whether an adaptation can be recovered from a responsible party depends on the evidence and applicable damages rules. An insurer’s refusal to pay immediately does not, by itself, answer the medical-need question.
Source: Gunn v. McCoy, proof of likely future care expenses.
What if a family caregiver also misses work?
Preserve the caregiver’s schedule, leave use, pay records, and the specific care provided. Explain why the assistance was needed, why that person provided it, and whether paid or other help was available.
The caregiver’s lost paycheck is not automatically an additional recoverable wage claim in the injured person’s case. The law may treat necessary care, household services, a family member’s independent claim, and employment leave differently. Do not simply add the caregiver’s salary to the injured person’s lost wages.
Ask the caregiver’s employer about available leave and certification requirements. FMLA may protect eligible workers taking qualifying family-care leave, but it does not cover every family relationship or guarantee wages. Keep the practical records now so the correct claim and benefit route can be evaluated later.
Sources: DOL FMLA questions; Gunn v. McCoy, care evidence.
How do I document future needs without assuming a specific recovery or permanent disability?
Record the current recommendation and the uncertainty together. Ask the clinician what is expected, what remains unknown, and when the outlook should be reassessed. Keep dates on every estimate.
A useful future-needs list has separate entries for care currently planned, care considered likely later, and care that is only a possibility. Include the conditions that could change the plan. Do not turn “may need surgery” into “will need surgery,” or a temporary work note into a lifetime restriction.
Update the list as recovery improves or new information emerges. If a settlement is being considered before the outlook is clear, identify that uncertainty explicitly before agreeing. A release may end the ability to seek more from the released party even if later care costs more than expected. Uncertainty is something to evaluate before settlement, not hide in the paperwork.
Source: Gunn v. McCoy, future-expense evidence.
What if my working capacity has changed even though current earnings have not fallen?
Document the change rather than assuming the paycheck settles the issue. You may be maintaining income through reduced duties, extra effort, help from coworkers, fewer outside activities, or an employer’s temporary accommodation. Those facts deserve an accurate record.
Identify duties you no longer perform, promotion or overtime opportunities affected, extra time needed, and any change in productivity or endurance. Also record what you can still do and any improvement. Separate a genuine injury-related limitation from speculation about a possible future job loss.
Current earnings are evidence of capacity, but a long-term analysis may look beyond one paycheck. The question is whether the injury caused a supported reduction in earning ability and how that reduction can be measured. The right evaluation may require medical and vocational information. Do not assign a percentage disability or lifetime dollar figure yourself.
Source: Strauss, earning capacity and supporting evidence.
Attorney reviewed by Jacob Alford · November 11, 2026
Disclaimer
Jacob Alford, a Texas personal injury lawyer, and Injured Texan PLLC at InjuredTexan.com provide this guide for general information, not legal advice about your particular claim. You are specifically warned about the dangers of attempting to handle a claim yourself.
In Jacobsen v. Allstate, the Court described Allstate’s own internal research that being represented (having a lawyer) meant a claim typically settled for 2–3 times as much. Allstate’s own research also showed that having a lawyer could multiply a recovery perhaps up to 5 times.
The Court documented the internal workings of Allstate’s training for its adjusters and showed just how rigged talking to Big Insurance can be. Read Allstate’s script and judge for yourself: Inside the Insurance Playbook: Jacobsen v. Allstate.
A recorded statement is designed to be used against you, and a verbal settlement can give up valuable rights. Get advice before a voluntary recorded interview or accepting an offer.
You do not need to decide whether to hire a lawyer before asking questions. Jacob Alford and Injured Texan PLLC at InjuredTexan.com offer a free, no-obligation discussion of the process, even if you do not want to hire a lawyer: 210-512-2222. Before you settle, make the free call.

